newtechinsouth

Monday, December 16, 2013

containing the word 'technology'

Found 1,350 jobs matching your criteria containing the word 'technology'


  • Food technology Teacher

    • Reading
    • £21000 - £35000 Per Annum
    Food Technology teacher required for Reading School ** Food Technology Teacher KS3 & KS4 ** Permanent Position ** Located in Reading in Berkshire ** January 2014 start An innovative teacher of Food Technology is required at an expanding Acade
    • Employer: HOURGLASS EDUCATION
    Add to Shortlist
    5 days left
  • THE LONDON TEACHING POOL

    Design Teachnology Role in Bromley - January Start

    • Bromley
    • £120 - £160 per day
    Design Technology TeacherDesign Technology Teaching positions in Bromley***Design Technology Teacher - Bromley***Maternity Cover***Recently rated as good with outstanding elements by Ofsted***Achieved its best ever GCSE.
    • All jobs from: THE LONDON TEACHING POOL
    Add to Shortlist
  • Teacher of Design and Technology - Warminster

    • Warminster, Wiltshire
    • MPS/UPS
    ***Teacher of Design and Technology ***Recently rated as Good with Outstanding elements by Ofsted ***Permanent opportunity beginning February 2014 ***Key Stage 3,4 and 5 D&T with the opportunity to teach a second subject ***MPS/UPS
    • Employer: EDUSTAFF BRISTOL
    Add to Shortlist
  • SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

    Faculty Lead for Technology Enhanced Learning

    • Sheffield
    • £47,314 to £54,826 per annum, dependent on experience
    You’ll drive the development of Technology Enhanced Learning across our large and innovative Faculty of Health and Wellbeing. Providing professional and academic leadership in the area of Technology Enhanced Learning.
    • All jobs from: SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY
    Add to Shortlist
  • Design Technology Teacher - Oman - September 2014

    • Oman
    • Attractive tax free salary including accommodation, utilities, return flights and lots more!!!
    This Outstanding International School based in Oman is looking for an experienced, exciting and creative Design and Technology Teacher to join them in September 2014.
    • Employer: EDUSTAFF INTERNATIONAL
    Add to Shortlist
    2 days left
  • Graduate Opportunities in Technology

    • Competitive
    Whether you’re interested in the technical aspects of IT or the commercial possibilities technology offers business, these roles offer a first step into a whole world of opportunities. What we do in Technology Technology underpins almost every aspec
    • Employer: Deloitte
    Add to Shortlist
    2 days left
  • Design & Technology Teacher – Worcestershire – January 2014

    • Redditch
    • £110 - £180 Per Day
    ** Design & Technology KS3 – KS5 ** Resistant Materials KS3 – KS5 ** Outstanding senior leadership team ** Two term position ** Based in Redditch
    • Employer: HOURGLASS EDUCATION
    Add to Shortlist
  • Design and Technology teacher

    • Switzerland
    • £33000.00 per annum
    Design & Technology Teacher (IB)SwedenImmediate StartAn International School in Sweden requires a qualified Design & Technology Teacher (IB) to join their school for an immediate start. Applicants must be qualified teachers holding a relevant qual
    • Employer: HAYS EDUCATION
    Add to Shortlist
  • ICT and Access Technology Volunteer - West Midlands Region

    • West Midlands
    • Unpaid Voluntary Work
    Do you have an interest in how technology can enable blind and partially sighted people to access information, develop their skills and support them become more independent? Would you like to help them use modern technology?
    • Employer: ACTION FOR BLIND PEOPLE
    Add to Shortlist
  • Head of Food Technology and Catering - Dynamic Secondary School in West London - April Start!

    • Greater London
    • MPS/UPS+TLR
    Head of Food Technology and Catering - Dynamic Secondary School in West London - April Start!
    • Employer: EDUSTAFF
    Add to Shortlist
  • Technology Training Volunteer - Northern Ireland

    • Northern Ireland
    • Unpaid Voluntary Work
    Do you have a passion for helping people discover the unlimited possibilities that technology can bring? Would you like to open up a world of opportunities for blind and partially sighted people in your local community by training them to use technology?
    • Employer: RNIB
    Add to Shortlist
  • Technology Training Support Volunteer - Northern Ireland

    • Northern Ireland
    • Unpaid Voluntary Work
    Do you have a passion for helping people? Would you like to help open up a world of opportunities for blind and partially sighted people in your local community by assisting one of our Technology Trainers run a short course?
    • Employer: RNIB

  • Teacher of Design Technology Job, West Sussex

    • Chichester
    • £90.00 - £120.00 per day
    TEACHER OF DESIGN TECHNOLOGY FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN BOGNOR REGIS AND CHICHESTER.Hays Education is currently working with secondary schools in Bognor Regis and Chichester who are looking for a Design Technology Teacher for a temporary period.We are also
    • Employer: HAYS EDUCATION
    Add to Shortlist
  • Technology Support and Training Volunteer - Northern Ireland

    • Northern Ireland
    • Unpaid Voluntary Work
    Do you have a passion for the unlimited possibilities that technology can bring? Would you like to open up a world of opportunities for blind and partially sighted people in your local community by training them to use technology?
    • Employer: RNIB
    Add to Shortlist
  • Account Manager - b2b tech PR for a mix of global and start up technology brands

    • London
    • £28000 - £35000 + benefits
    This growing technology PR specialist is seeking a passionate Account Manager - you will be handling a mix of global and exciting start up technology brands as well as managing a talented boutique team.
    • Employer: THE WORKS SEARCH & SELECTION LLP
    Add to Shortlist
    6 days left
  • Design & Technology (Art) Teacher - North London

    • Barnet
    • £130 - £230 per day
    Design & Technology (Art) Start ASAP Temporary, full time Ofsted 'Outstanding' graded school Key Stage 5 London Borough of Barnet
    • Employer: HORIZON TEACHERS
    Add to Shortlist
  • IT Graduate / Technology Graduate

    • Based in Corby, Northamptonshire (NN17) - Commutable from Kettering, Peterborough, Leicester, Market Harborough
    • £16k
    We are looking for an eager IT Graduate / Technology Graduate to join our client who provides specialist sales and marketing consultancy to many software companies throughout England.
    • Employer: GURU CAREERS
    Add to Shortlist
    6 days left
  • THE WORKS SEARCH & SELECTION LLP

    Senior PR and Communications Manager - a best kept secret technology company

    • South East region
    • £45000 - £55000 + benefits
    Greenfield in-house b2b technology PR and communications role with a company that are the secret behind several well-known technology names - they achieve exceptional staff and client retention rates.
    • All jobs from: THE WORKS SEARCH & SELECTION LLP
    Add to Shortlist
  • Food Technology Teacher

    • Reading
    • Negotiable
    ***Food Technology ***January star for two terms ***Reading ***Well run school with 'Outstanding' Ofsted This large, modern and most importantly well run comprehensive school requires a new Food Technology teacher to join on a temporary basis, initially f
    • Employer: ACADEMICS LTD
    Add to Shortlist
  • Secondary Teacher: Teacher of Technology Fortrose Academy

    • Ross & Cromarty
    • £21,438 - £34,200
    Teacher of Technology is required.
    Posted by techideas at 5:24 AM No comments:
    Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

    Microsoft Gmail technologies

    Microsoft Builds New Tool To Help Gmail Users Move To Outlook.com


    Microsoft would greatly appreciate it if you could knock off that Gmailing business and move to its Outlook.com email service. I refuse to, and so do more people than Microsoft prefers, so the company today released a new tool that will make it easier for Gmail users to jump ship.
    The Outlook.com switching tool is designed to make changing inbox homes more seamless and less an exercise in re-tagging. It will propagate over the next few weeks to all 400 million-plus Outlook.com users — as well as current Gmail users who have yet to make the move — a simple path to a new email home.
    The tool, which you can find directions for here, will hold your hand when changing teams, though expect to wait a bit as it could be a while for your email to slip over. The transition will bring over your most recent email more quickly than the rest. But, you should be sorted in short order. The new tool will land over the next few weeks. If you don’t have it now, sit tight.
    The company has research indicating that people are more willing to change email providers if the friction betwixt the two is minimized. That’s logical. So, as Microsoft wants to knock Gmail off its tech throne (name a technology leader who swears by Outlook.com over Gmail), it is working to lower the delta between leaving Google and dropping into its own product.
    Outlook.com is a worthy tool that is far superior to its Hotmail predecessor. Buckled with functionally unlimited storage, Outlook.com grew quickly organically, and then benefited from the end of Hotmail itself.

    Technology Lab / Information Technology

    Is it a good or bad idea to rotate developers on a single project?

    This Q&A is part of a weekly series of posts highlighting common questions encountered by technophiles and answered by users at Stack Exchange, a free, community-powered network of 100+ 
    I'm part of a small team that will begin working on a large new project with another small team. The other team is currently working on a legacy system that they have been working on for years.
    The manager has decided that the developers from my team will be rotating every few months to replace developers working on the legacy system. That way the other team will have a chance to work on the new project and have a better understanding of the new system.
    I want to know the benefits and drawbacks (if any) of rotating the developers from the project every 2-3 months.
    I know that this is a similar question to "Is rotating the lead developer a good or bad idea?" but that question focuses on a lead developer. This question is about rotating the entire team on and off the project (our tech lead for the new project may or may not be rotated—I don't know yet).
    See the original question .

    Sounds great

    I don't see much of a downside here myself. The rotation gets you:
    Cross pollination of institutional knowledge: everyone will know the legacy project and the new one, at least in theory.
    Cross training: different projects require different things often. You grow much more as a developer working in ugly legacy projects than in nice, clean greenfield projects.
    Fundamentally better projects: nothing like having a new team coming in to make you finish documentation and clean up ugly processes you are willing to live with but not publicly admit to.
    Better code: more heads are better in most cases.
    Likely morale improvements: variety is the spice of life. And who wants to be stuck in legacy project bug fixing/duct-taping mode permanently? Also keep in mind your "new" project will become legacy at some point: do you want to be stuck there forever?
    Probably the only downside is the productivity drop you get from switching places but that should only hurt bad the first go-round. Afterwards, both sides will have some seat time in both places and the ugly parts of the handoff will probably be better understood and perhaps solved.

    Sounds not-so-great

    I'm surprised that everybody thinks this is such a good thing. The authors of Peopleware (which, in my opinion, is still one of the precious few software project management books actually worth reading) strongly disagree. Almost the entire Part IV of the book is dedicated to this very issue.

    The software team is an incredibly important functional unit. Teams need to jell to become really productive. It takes time (a lot of time) for team members to earn each others' respect, to learn each others' habits and quirks and strengths and weaknesses.
    Certainly, from personal experience, I can say that after a year of working with certain people, I've learned to laugh off certain things that used to rile me up, my estimates as team lead are much better, and it's not too difficult to get the work distributed so as to make everyone happy. It wasn't like that in the beginning.
    Now you might say, "Oh, but we're not breaking up the whole team, just moving a few people." But consider (a) how blindly unproductive their replacements are going to be in the beginning, and (b) how many times you'll find yourself or other teams saying, without even thinking, "I really liked X," or "This would have been easier with Y still around," subtly and unconsciously offending the new members and creating schisms within the existing team, even sowing discontent among the "old" members.
    People don't do this on purpose, of course, but it happens almost every time. People do it without thinking. And if they force themselves not to, they end up focusing on the issue even more and become frustrated by the forced silence. Teams and even sub-teams will develop synergies that get lost when you screw around with the structure. The Peopleware authors call it a form of "teamicide."
    That being said, even though rotating team members is a horrible practice, rotating teams themselves is perfectly fine. Although well-run software companies should have some concept of product ownership, it's not nearly as disruptive to a team to move that entire team to a different project, as long as the team actually gets to finish the old project or at least bring it to a level they're happy with.
    By having "team" stints instead of "developer" stints, you get all the same benefits you would expect to get with rotating developers (documentation, "cross-pollination," etc.) without any of the nasty side-effects on each team as a unit. To those who don't really understand management, it may seem less productive, but rest assured that the productivity lost by splitting up the team totally dwarfs the productivity lost by moving that team to a different project.
    P.S. In your footnote you mention that the tech lead might be the only person not to be rotated. This is pretty much guaranteed to mess up both teams. The tech lead is a leader, not a manager, he or she has to earn the respect of the team and is not simply granted authority by higher levels of management. Putting an entire team under the direction of a new lead whom they've never worked with and who is very likely to have different ideas about things like architecture, usability, code organization, estimation... well, it's going to be stressful as hell for the lead trying to build credibility and very unproductive for the team members who start to lose cohesion in the absence of their old lead. Sometimes companies have to do this, i.e. if the lead quits or gets promoted, but doing it by choice sounds insane.

    Ministry of Innovation / Business of Technology

    The Christmas miracle of ChristmasCats.tv

    The mystery webcam is gone, but the story of the Internet sensation remains.


    The elf imbibes from a flask while granny knits with her cats to the crooners of old-timey Christmas music.

    Christmascats.tv was gone almost as soon as it came. For three days, people passed around the link to ChristmasCats.tv that gave them a glimpse into a holiday idyll: a grandmother and an elf, surrounded by cats fluffy and sleek, who teased the sweater-swaddled animals with toys as an old-timey Christmas soundtrack played in the background. On December 6 at 5pm, it was reduced to a loop of past footage.
    It looked for all the world like a public access channel holding pattern, with only a couple more accoutrements than the looping video of a fireplace set to holiday carols. It combined that comforting, if artificial, display with one of the Internet’s greatest gifts: animal cams. Not only was the set replete with cats, but with people to play with them. They were also available for adoption (the cats, not the people).
    The entire setup was actually in service of selling the old Christmas music playing as the background to the cats’ antics. Sony’s digital marketing department created the setup as a vector for the company’s classic Christmas album catalog. This motivation wasn't even betrayed by the “buy now” link, which linked only an online search for “classic christmas albums.”
    The marketing team was tasked with “[imagining] a holiday campaign for legacy recordings,” said Jason Cohen, senior director of digital marketing. Cohen described himself as an owner of four cats and said he happened to note that cats are somewhat of interest to the Internet. “It’s kind of a challenge to work with an Internet meme,” he admitted.

    Typical animal cams just involve the animals, which leads to them sleeping a lot of the time. Cohen told Ars he introduced people because he wanted the viewers to be able to interact with the scene; for instance, requesting the elf to answer a question. But the people also ended up proving a good catalyst for stirring the felines to action by petting them or taunting them with toys.
    Cohen and his team hired the two actors (the grandmother is actually a grandmother, Cohen said) and penned them in on a stage in Greenpoint, Brooklyn with a handful of cats from the North Shore Animal League (NSAL). All of the cats were available for adoption.
    Cohen told Ars that the stage only operated from 9-5 for the three days ChristmasCats.tv was live. The area fenced in with plywood for the cats to roam was actually twice as large as what the camera showed, with room for the cat’s litterboxes, food, and water at the foot of the camera.
    The NSAL received many requests for their cats and “loved” the campaign, Cohen said.
    The ChristmasCats.tv Twitter account started with no followers just before launch, and the Facebook fan page started with no likes. They ended with 1,180 followers and 2,869 likes—a modest success, but enough that Sony would consider a similar campaign again, Cohen said. “It was about the music and helping the cats,” Cohen said. “I think we did a good job.” The original live footage is now playing on a loop, which Cohen says will likely stay up through Christmas.

    Posted by techideas at 5:21 AM No comments:
    Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

    Saturday, December 14, 2013

    Google Technology

    The technology behind Google's great results
    As a Google user, you're familiar with the speed and accuracy of a Google search. How exactly does Google manage to find the right results for every query as quickly as it does? The heart of Google's search technology is PigeonRank™, a system for ranking web pages developed by Google founders and  at Stanford University.
    PigeonRank System
    Building upon the breakthrough work of B. F. Skinner, Page and Brin reasoned that low cost pigeon clusters (PCs) could be used to compute the relative value of web pages faster than human editors or machine-based algorithms. And while Google has dozens of engineers working to improve every aspect of our service on a daily basis, PigeonRank continues to provide the basis for all of our web search tools.
    Why Google's patented PigeonRank™ works so well
    PigeonRank's success relies primarily on the superior trainability of the domestic pigeon (Columba livia) and its unique capacity to recognize objects regardless of spatial orientation. The common gray pigeon can easily distinguish among items displaying only the minutest differences, an ability that enables it to select relevant web sites from among thousands of similar pages.
    By collecting flocks of pigeons in dense clusters, Google is able to process search queries at speeds superior to traditional search engines, which typically rely on birds of prey, brooding hens or slow-moving waterfowl to do their relevance rankings.
    diagramWhen a search query is submitted to Google, it is routed to a data coop where monitors flash result pages at blazing speeds. When a relevant result is observed by one of the pigeons in the cluster, it strikes a rubber-coated steel bar with its beak, which assigns the page a PigeonRank value of one. For each peck, the PigeonRank increases. Those pages receiving the most pecks, are returned at the top of the user's results page with the other results displayed in pecking order.
    Integrity
    Google's pigeon-driven methods make tampering with our results extremely difficult. While some unscrupulous websites have tried to boost their ranking by including images on their pages of bread crumbs, bird seed and parrots posing seductively in resplendent plumage, Google's PigeonRank technology cannot be deceived by these techniques. A Google search is an easy, honest and objective way to find high-quality websites with information relevant to your search.
    Data
    PigeonRank Frequently Asked Questions
    The ease of training pigeons was documented early in the annals of science and fully explored by noted psychologist B.F. Skinner, who demonstrated that with only minor incentives, pigeons could be trained to execute complex tasks such as playing ping pong, piloting bombs or revising the Abatements, Credits and Refunds section of the national tax code.
    Brin and Page were the first to recognize that this adaptability could be harnessed through massively parallel pecking to solve complex problems, such as ordering large datasets or ordering pizza for large groups of engineers. Page and Brin experimented with numerous avian motivators before settling on a combination of linseed and flax (lin/ax) that not only offered superior performance, but could be gathered at no cost from nearby open space preserves. This open space lin/ax powers Google's operations to this day, and a visit to the data coop reveals pigeons happily pecking away at lin/ax kernels and seeds.
    What are the challenges of operating so many pigeon clusters (PCs)?
    Pigeons naturally operate in dense populations, as anyone holding a pack of peanuts in an urban plaza is aware. This compactability enables Google to pack enormous numbers of processors into small spaces, with rack after rack stacked up in our data coops. While this is optimal from the standpoint of space conservation and pigeon contentment, it does create issues during molting season, when large fans must be brought in to blow feathers out of the data coop. Removal of other pigeon byproducts was a greater challenge, until Page and Brin developed groundbreaking technology for converting poop to pixels, the tiny dots that make up a monitor's display. The clean white background of Google's home page is powered by this renewable process.
    Aren't pigeons really stupid? How do they do this?
    While no pigeon has actually been confirmed for a seat on the Supreme Court, pigeons are surprisingly adept at making instant judgments when confronted with difficult choices. This makes them suitable for any job requiring accurate and authoritative decision-making under pressure. Among the positions in which pigeons have served capably are replacement air traffic controllers, butterfly ballot counters and pro football referees during the "no-instant replay" years.
    Where does Google get its pigeons? Some special breeding lab?
    Google uses only low-cost, off-the-street pigeons for its clusters. Gathered from city parks and plazas by Google's pack of more than 50 Phds (Pigeon-harvesting dogs), the pigeons are given a quick orientation on web site relevance and assigned to an appropriate data coop.
    Isn't it cruel to keep pigeons penned up in tiny data coops?
    Google exceeds all international standards for the ethical treatment of its pigeon personnel. Not only are they given free range of the coop and its window ledges, special break rooms have been set up for their convenience. These rooms are stocked with an assortment of delectable seeds and grains and feature the finest in European statuary for roosting.
    What's the future of pigeon computing?
    Google continues to explore new applications for PigeonRank and affiliated technologies. One of the most promising projects in development involves harnessing millions of pigeons worldwide to work on complex scientific challenges. For the latest developments on Google's distributed cooing initiative, please consider signing up for our Google Friends newsletter.

    Google Adds to Its Menagerie of Robots


    Boston Dynamics
    Boston Dynamics’ four-legged robot named WildCat can gallop at high 
    • .
    Multimedia
    Bits

    More Tech Coverage

    News from the technology industry, including start-ups, the Internet, enterprise and gadgets.
    On Twitter: @nytimesbits.
    Enlarge This Image
    Boston Dynamics
    A robot named BigDog, which can walk over rough terrain, can also stay upright in response to a well-placed human kick.
    Google confirmed on Friday that it had completed the acquisition of Boston Dynamics, an engineering company that has designed mobile research robots for the Pentagon. The company, based in Waltham, Mass., has gained an international reputation for machines that walk with an uncanny sense of balance and even — cheetahlike — run faster than the fastest humans.
    It is the eighth robotics company that Google has acquired in the last half-year. Executives at the Internet giant are circumspect about what exactly they plan to do with their robot collection. But Boston Dynamics and its animal kingdom-themed machines bring significant cachet to Google’s robotic efforts, which are being led by Andy Rubin, the Google executive who spearheaded the development of Android, the world’s most widely used smartphone software.
    The deal is also the clearest indication yet that Google is intent on building a new class of autonomous systems that might do anything from warehouse work to package delivery and even elder care.
    Boston Dynamics was founded in 1992 by Marc Raibert, a former professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It has not sold robots commercially, but has pushed the limits of mobile and off-road robotics technology, mostly for Pentagon clients like the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or Darpa. Early on, the company also did consulting work for Sony on consumer robots like the Aibo robotic dog.
    Boston Dynamics’ walking robots have a reputation for being extraordinarily agile, able to walk over rough terrain and handle surfaces that in some cases are challenging even for humans.
    A video of one of its robots named BigDog shows a noisy, gas-powered, four-legged, walking robot that climbs hills, travels through snow, skitters precariously on ice and even manages to stay upright in response to a well-placed human kick. BigDog development started in 2003 in partnership with the British robot maker Foster-Miller, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Harvard.
    The video has been viewed more than 15 million times since it was posted on YouTube in 2008.
    More recently, Boston Dynamics distributed a video of a four-legged robot named WildCat, galloping in high-speed circles in a parking lot.
    Although the videos frequently inspire comments that the robots will evolve into scary killing machines straight out of the “Terminator” movies, Dr. Raibert has said in the past that he does not consider his company to be a military contractor — it is merely trying to advance robotics technology. Google executives said the company would honor existing military contracts, but that it did not plan to move toward becoming a military contractor on its own.
    Under a $10.8 million contract, Boston Dynamics is currently supplying Darpa with a set of humanoid robots named Atlas to participate in the Darpa Robotics Challenge, a two-year contest with a $2 million prize. The contest’s goal is creating a class of robots that can operate in natural disasters and catastrophes like the nuclear power plant meltdown in Fukushima, Japan.
    “Competitions like the Darpa Robotics Challenge stretch participants to try to solve problems that matter and we hope to learn from the teams’ insights around disaster relief,” Mr. Rubin said in a statement released by Google.
    Boston Dynamics has also designed robots that can climb walls and trees as well as other two- and four-legged walking robots, a neat match to Mr. Rubin’s notion that “computers are starting to sprout legs and move around in the environment.”
    A recent video shows a robot named Cheetah running on a treadmill. This year, the robot was clocked running 29 miles per hour, surpassing the previous legged robot land speed record of 13.1 m.p.h., set in 1999. That’s about one mile per hour faster than Jamaica’s Usain Bolt, the two-time Olympic gold medalist in the 100-meter dash. But it’s far short of a real cheetah, which can hit 65 m.p.h.
    Google’s other robotics acquisitions include companies in the United States and Japan that have pioneered a range of technologies including software for advanced robot arms, grasping technology and computer vision. Mr. Rubin has also said that he is interested in advancing sensor technology.
    Mr. Rubin has called his robotics effort a “moonshot,” but has declined to describe specific products that might come from the project. He has, however, also said that he does not expect initial product development to go on for years, indicating that Google commercial robots of some nature could be available in the next several years.
    Google declined to say much it paid for its newest robotics acquisition and said that it did not plan to release financial information on any of the other companies it has recently bought.
    Dr. Raibert is known as the father of walking robots in the United States. He originally created the Leg Lab, a research laboratory to explore walking machines at Carnegie Mellon University in 1980. He then moved the laboratory to M.I.T. before leaving academia to build engineering systems for the military and Sony.
    His research in walking robots began with a pogo-stick project called “the hopper,” which he used to test basic concepts.
    “I am excited by Andy and Google’s ability to think very, very big,” Dr. Raibert said, “with the resources to make it happen.”
     
    Posted by techideas at 1:31 AM No comments:
    Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
    Newer Posts Older Posts Home
    Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)
    Powered By Blogger

    About Me

    techideas
    View my complete profile

    Blog Archive

    • ►  2015 (5)
      • ►  February (1)
      • ►  January (4)
    • ►  2014 (31)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (8)
      • ►  April (5)
      • ►  March (8)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ▼  2013 (35)
      • ▼  December (3)
        • containing the word 'technology'
        • Microsoft Gmail technologies
        • Google Technology
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (8)
      • ►  September (13)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (5)
    Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.